Ethical Dilemma's

A main topic in debate is whether a patient with a impediment is able to bring in the eat to end their life while in a cunning state of mind. A big problem with this is that many body forth a hard time determining whether some(a) star with a physical disability is rational or non. There atomic number 18 many widely formed ideas about disabled the great unwashed and whether or non they are capable of making decisions as they derriere no longer be rational. The problem with mills theory is that it focuses on the consequences of an action and not the decision-making process leading(p) up to that action. Much of the debate against mercy killing is that the bank comes from feeling and other influences that would falsify a individuals mind. This change in thinking may go against a individuals values when they were rational and may very neediness to be stopped from committing suicide. However, Mills Utilitarianism does not civilize these factors into account. I n one situation, suicide could be good concord to the Utilitarian ideology, and in another it could be immoral, it wholly depends on how much happiness is brought about with the loss of that persons life.

Generally, euthanasia would bring about to a greater extremity trouble than happiness, but there are the few part where some ones death might be a better option. Mills theory to a fault piles more into account other peoples views preferably than the one making the decision. A person with a disability would not be able to make decisions for themselves and must make them for the interestingness of others un der this way of thinking. It is because Mill! s Utilitarianism cannot take a firm position on the morality of euthanasia that it is not best ethical theory to use to motility the issue.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay